The Scientific
Revolution, created by Copernicus, Galilieo, Descartes, and lastly Newton,
became a great indicator of global modernity. Being able to draw the line with
the Modern Era allows readers to make sense of the past to understand the
timeline of eras. It makes sense that religion made an impact on the Scientific
Revolution because it was their religious beliefs that were put into question
that sparked a revolution. One thing I enjoyed about this passage was to be
able to clearly see the progress being made throughout the years as science
evolved. Nicolaus Copernicus discovered that the middle of our solar system is
the sun and every planet rotates on its axis. Twenty-eight years later,
Johannes Kepler discovered that the orbit of planets follow an elliptical
pattern rather than a circular one. During this time, Galileo Galilei
“developed the telescope; the sun spots, mountains, on the moon, and Jupiter’s
moons…” Lastly, Isaac Newton left his mark by discovering “the concept of universal
gravitation; invented calculus; formulated concept of inertia, and laws of
motion.” One concept that I agree with is the concept of progress in human
beings. Progress, according to Strayer, is attained by think, conflict, and
struggle, rather than reason and education. Reason and education seems to be
directed more towards religious progress, and if I were to choose one,
progress, scientifically, makes more sense and is more rational.
Wednesday, February 4, 2015
Monday, February 2, 2015
Chapter 15 Religion and Science - Blog #5
New religions
are still being created today because of the unique mindsets humans possess
whether they are praising Jesus, Satan, or some other spiritual being.
Religions are often created because of a certain cause that the community of
people all seeks. Strayer gives a perfect example of denominations from
religions being created during movements. As the protestant movement spread to
France, Switzerland, England and elsewhere protestant denominations resulted in
Lutheran, Calvinist, Anglican, Quaker and Anabaptists Some denominations have a
focuses that they would want their people to follow. The example in the book by Strayer mentions
the New England Puritans, which is a Protestan version of Christianity that
“[emphasizes] on education, moral purity, personal conversion, civic
responsibility, and little tolerance for competing expressions of the faith.”
In this section of Christianity Outward
Bound, the people of the New England Puritans did not show any interest in
converting the native people. At first I questioned why, but then I thought
about it and made some sense of it. The native people with their traditional
beliefs would get in the way of the Puritan’s focuses. The Puritan’s “[pushed]
them out of their ancestral territories” and by doing so, they removed the
potential threats that would get in the way of their focuses. I personally do
not think that is right to do considering their ancestors were there before
them. If anything the New England Puritan’s should have relocated somewhere
else that would not obstruct other people. By removing those people, they are
risking the loss of traditional beliefs that they possessed by replacing it
with new ones.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)